Section 29
Criteria For Promotion
(1) The promotion committee shall recommend an employee for promotion based on his or her work
efficiency.
(2) In evaluating the work efficiency of the employee, a maximum of 100 marks shall be granted as follows:
(a) For work performance evaluation -Forty marks
(b) For seniority -Twenty marks
(c) For service in geographical
region -Twenty Five marks
(d) For educational qualificationand training -Fifteen marks (3)The allocation of marks as referred to in Sub-section (2) shall be as prescribed.
34 The evaluation of work performance by employees shall be made on the prescribed criteria.
(5) The concerned……….
35 employee who is not satisfied with the recommendation for promotion made by the promotion committee
pursuant to Sub-section (1) may file a complaint with the Public Service Commission within Thirty Five days after the date on which such recommendation is made. The complaint so made shall be settled
within Sixty days.
(6) If, in settling the complaint pursuant to Sub-section (5), it appears that an erroneous evaluation was made deliberately, the Public Service Commission may write to the Head of Department to warn the concerned employee.
efficiency.
(2) In evaluating the work efficiency of the employee, a maximum of 100 marks shall be granted as follows:
(a) For work performance evaluation -Forty marks
(b) For seniority -Twenty marks
(c) For service in geographical
region -Twenty Five marks
(d) For educational qualificationand training -Fifteen marks (3)The allocation of marks as referred to in Sub-section (2) shall be as prescribed.
34 The evaluation of work performance by employees shall be made on the prescribed criteria.
(5) The concerned……….
35 employee who is not satisfied with the recommendation for promotion made by the promotion committee
pursuant to Sub-section (1) may file a complaint with the Public Service Commission within Thirty Five days after the date on which such recommendation is made. The complaint so made shall be settled
within Sixty days.
(6) If, in settling the complaint pursuant to Sub-section (5), it appears that an erroneous evaluation was made deliberately, the Public Service Commission may write to the Head of Department to warn the concerned employee.